denise: Image: Me, facing away from camera, on top of the Castel Sant'Angelo in Rome (Default)
Denise ([staff profile] denise) wrote in [site community profile] dw_styles2011-08-23 10:39 am

Which other methods of categorizing styles can you think of?

I've just migrated Bug 3883: Add an Optimized-for-small-screens category to the Select Journal Style page and am opening a bug for additional other categories:

* optimized for large fonts
* high contrast
* low contrast
* streamlined/minimal distractions

What other categories can you think of that you would want to see? I'm mostly interested in things that are accessibility-needs related, but if you can think of other ways to categorize, I'd like to know.

[personal profile] ex_rising236 2011-08-23 03:41 pm (UTC)(link)
Yeah, I've had problems with the italics-to-colours thing to, and such, or that the whitespace between lines was a little too much for me to actually read it easily. It is what got me into the more finicky parts of custom CSS overall.
musyc: Draco facepalming (Malfoy: Facepalm)

[personal profile] musyc 2011-08-23 04:22 pm (UTC)(link)
Hahahaha, exactly. "This layout is awesome, but why is my bolding pink, auuuuugh?" The number of times I've had to baby-step a friend through tweaking one line because of a designer's decorations over the past decade. *flump*
zvi: self-portrait: short, fat, black dyke in bunny slippers (Default)

[personal profile] zvi 2011-08-23 04:24 pm (UTC)(link)
As an interim categorizing measure, we could create a category for "changes text styles in non-default ways".
jesse_the_k: Ultra modern white fabric interlaced to create strong weave (interdependence)

[personal profile] jesse_the_k 2011-08-23 08:01 pm (UTC)(link)
ZOMG that is the right name for the category and would be very helpful. (For values of standard = DW light, of course.)