denise: Image: Me, facing away from camera, on top of the Castel Sant'Angelo in Rome (Default)
Denise ([staff profile] denise) wrote in [site community profile] dw_styles2011-08-23 10:39 am

Which other methods of categorizing styles can you think of?

I've just migrated Bug 3883: Add an Optimized-for-small-screens category to the Select Journal Style page and am opening a bug for additional other categories:

* optimized for large fonts
* high contrast
* low contrast
* streamlined/minimal distractions

What other categories can you think of that you would want to see? I'm mostly interested in things that are accessibility-needs related, but if you can think of other ways to categorize, I'd like to know.
susanreads: my avatar, a white woman with brown hair and glasses (Default)

[personal profile] susanreads 2011-08-23 09:03 pm (UTC)(link)
How does it handle links? I want the links in entry content to be underlined (and also distinguishable colours, but we can customize that in the wizard); a lot of styles lose the underline, or it depends on the active state of the link. On some sites, so probably in some styles, the font changes e.g. to bold when you mouse-over a link, which annoys me and must be an accessibility concern for some people.
jesse_the_k: Baby wearing black glasses bigger than head (eyeglasses baby)

[personal profile] jesse_the_k 2011-08-24 03:22 am (UTC)(link)
As always, it depends. I find the underline decrease readability, and I kludge them away with an !important statement when they're present.